The Times’ big scoop, the George Bush interview, is dampened by the fact that the Guardian and The Indy have also seen copies of his memoirs, which are released in the US tomorrow. I would be suprised if The Times hadn’t tried to do a deal with Bush to secure that only they could see the memoirs before publication. If not they have negotiated a poor deal. The fact that the other papers have it means that online very little of The Times’ content will get out from behind the pay wall – people will just read the slightly less good version of the story on the Guardian website. The Times’ editors must be fuming that their splash has been so badly ruined.
- Google graph showing Internet to Syria cut again google.com/transparencyre… 3 days ago
- @marcusmason @MousaBaraka @watsoalex not sure I agree with the analysis. This is not necessarily about US decline, more about US disinterest 4 days ago
- I watched Beauty and the Beast yesterday. Basically just an advert for Stockholm Syndrome en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm… 1 week ago
- Interesting #Nasrallah implied #Syria now opening up Golan for rebel groups to attack #Israel. Aim to transform "threat into an opportunity” 1 week ago
My tagsassange australian papers British newspapers data david cameron Demo 2010 Egypt Egyptian revolution Eurozone crisis foreign correspondent foreign news Front page Front pages catalogue George Bush memoirs Herald-Sun Irish debt Joe Dyke julian assange labour leaked document leaks Libya local newspapers London micheala wrong Middle East MP Mubarak national newspapers news Newspaper front pages Newspaper review newspapers Paper review Pay Wall politics Protest Student protest Student violence The Australian The Times US diplomacy Violent protest wall street journal wikileaks