There is so much being unsaid in the continuing debate over the ‘Lockerbie bomber’ Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi that I felt I had to write something. It now appears that the British government may have been pressuring for the release of Al-Megrahi in order to secure economic deals with their new allies in Libya, which is contrary to international law and despicable behaviour. But this is obscuring a wider debate about whether Al-Megrahi was guilty in the first place.
- RT @PalElections: The list of Nominees in the west Bank and #Gaza are now available on the following link onedrive.live.com/?id=32907CE66F… #PalLocal… 35 minutes ago
- Not agreeing with his opinion, but numbers are fascinating illustration of fundamental shift/takeover of Labour. twitter.com/SnoozeInBrief/… 5 hours ago
- RT @Schroeder_Bas: Important read by @joedyke from @AFP about the highly intransparent trial against @WorldVision staffer in #Gaza https://… 19 hours ago
- @AhronRShapiro @Sophiemcneill That wouldn't preclude all evidence being heard in public, though. Could keep those parts secret no? 1 day ago
My tagsabandon allegra stratton assange australian papers babies benefits British newspapers cable cablegate cameron court reporting courts cynical journalist daily mail data david cameron Demo 2010 Egypt Egyptian revolution english fees Eurozone crisis foreign correspondent foreign news frontline Front page Front pages catalogue George Bush memoirs guardian Herald-Sun Irish debt Joe Dyke judge julian assange labour leaked document leaks Libya local newspapers London mark pritchard micheala wrong Middle East MP Mubarak national newspapers news Newspaper front pages Newspaper review newspapers Paper review Pay Wall politics Protest purple purple plotters review of the yaer review of the year savings scottish fees Student protest Student violence Telegraph The Australian The Times tuition fees twitter twitter-courts US diplomacy vince cable Violent protest wall street journal welsh student fees welsh students west lothian question wikileaks